{"id":1997,"date":"2013-01-16T12:40:27","date_gmt":"2013-01-16T16:40:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/?p=1997"},"modified":"2013-01-21T14:07:30","modified_gmt":"2013-01-21T18:07:30","slug":"stereotype-short-stack-cash-players","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/stereotype-short-stack-cash-players","title":{"rendered":"Stereotyping Short-Stack Cash Game Players"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/04\/micro-stakes-poker-strategy.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-1372\" title=\"micro-stakes-poker-strategy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/04\/micro-stakes-poker-strategy.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"259\" height=\"194\" \/><\/a>As most semi-knowledgeable\u00a0No-Limit poker players realize, it&#8217;s a better idea to start with a full stack, rather than coming into the game short-stacked. By beginning with the full 100 big blinds, you&#8217;ll be able to maximize winnings if you and another opponent go all-in. So it seems that only a total fish would want to start off with less than 100bb and we should assume that they&#8217;re bad. But as we&#8217;ll discuss below, automatically stereotyping short-stacks as fish can be harmful to your bankroll.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Power of Illusion<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Not every cash game player who sits in with a short-stack is terrible. In fact, there is a small percentage of players who want to create the illusion that they&#8217;re total fish just so people underestimate them. Furthermore, it forces some full stacks to make bad decisions in thinking that they&#8217;re dealing with an inferior opponent. So regulars can experience success with a short-stack by using a combination of good skills and the element of surprise.<\/p>\n<p><strong>How to spot Good Short-Stack Players<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Obviously you don&#8217;t want to treat an experienced short-stacker like a noob, so it pays to identify them. The biggest giveaway to a good short-stacked player is that they&#8217;ll be multi-tabling the same stakes. Assuming you also multi-table, you might see their screen name on another table or two &#8211; thus letting you know they&#8217;re probably skilled.<\/p>\n<p>Another telltale sign is that their bankroll will never drop below a certain amount. For example, if a short-stacker begins with 40bb, they might reload as soon as it dips below 25bb. After all, they don&#8217;t want to have such an\u00a0insignificant stack that full stacks are never afraid to call a raise or reraise.<\/p>\n<p>From an overall perspective though, you can generally assume a short-stack is a bad player, until they prove otherwise. For the 5-10% of players that do prove otherwise, simply make the proper adjustments and keep making money.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As most semi-knowledgeable\u00a0No-Limit poker players realize, it&#8217;s a better idea to start with a full stack, rather than coming into the game short-stacked. By beginning with the full 100 big blinds, you&#8217;ll be able to maximize winnings if you and another opponent go all-in. So it seems that only a total fish would want to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,18],"tags":[1069,1072,1070,1886,1068,1071],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1997"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1997"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1997\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2002,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1997\/revisions\/2002"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1997"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1997"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1997"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}