{"id":3454,"date":"2014-05-17T11:00:18","date_gmt":"2014-05-17T15:00:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/?p=3454"},"modified":"2014-05-19T15:13:31","modified_gmt":"2014-05-19T19:13:31","slug":"pokerstars-us-fast-fold-patent-advantage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/pokerstars-us-fast-fold-patent-advantage","title":{"rendered":"PokerStars&#8217; US Fast-Fold Patent gives them a Tremendous Advantage"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/pokerstars-patent-fast-fold-us.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/pokerstars-patent-fast-fold-us-300x158.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"pokerstars-patent-fast-fold-us\" width=\"300\" height=\"158\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-3464\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/pokerstars-patent-fast-fold-us-300x158.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/pokerstars-patent-fast-fold-us.jpg 535w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a>PokerStars has struck out three times in their efforts to enter the US online poker market. Nevada flat-out denied them, New Jersey said wait two more years, and Delaware didn&#8217;t want an operation without an online casino. But while Stars has watched fellow competitors like 888 and partypoker enter the US market, they still hold the trump card.<\/p>\n<p>The Rational Group, PokerStars&#8217; parent company, managed to gain a patent on fast-fold poker, which bodes well for their Zoom Poker product. Patent Number 8,727,850, listed as &#8220;Computer gaming device and method for computer gaming,&#8221; gives Stars exclusive rights to offer fast-fold variants. This means that 888, which offers Snap Poker, and partypoker, which offers FastForward, both need to worry about their fast-fold variants from a legal standpoint.<\/p>\n<p>Apparently, all it took for PokerStars to gain the patent after hundreds of rejections was a meeting with a United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) examiner. The examiner explained that Stars should change the phrase &#8220;folding out of turn&#8221; to refer to &#8220;when gameplay is at a position of another one of the first plurality of players.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Thanks to this simple change, PokerStars now owns a key chip with regard to success in the Untied States. Many poker networks around the world are using fast-fold versions to attract more recreational players. After all, fast-fold poker moves players to a new table with fresh cards when they fold &#8211; thus allowing for more hands and less waiting.<\/p>\n<p>With the US market still in its infancy, Stars figures to gain a big upperhand once a state does accept their gaming application. The world&#8217;s largest poker site definitely has a good opportunity to enter California. Many believe that the Golden State will legalize poker within the next year. And with Stars heavily lobbying politicians in a state with no major casinos &#8211; unlike Nevada and Atlantic City &#8211; they&#8217;re less likely to get shut out of California.<\/p>\n<p>So whenever PokerStars does get accepted into the US, they&#8217;ll definitely have one big advantage over everybody else &#8211; as if they didn&#8217;t already with their massive size and resources.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>PokerStars has struck out three times in their efforts to enter the US online poker market. Nevada flat-out denied them, New Jersey said wait two more years, and Delaware didn&#8217;t want an operation without an online casino. But while Stars has watched fellow competitors like 888 and partypoker enter the US market, they still hold [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,6,1],"tags":[1654,1653,1508,301,1655,1182,882,972],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3454"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3454"}],"version-history":[{"count":14,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3454\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3470,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3454\/revisions\/3470"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3454"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3454"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3454"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}