{"id":3801,"date":"2014-09-06T15:40:08","date_gmt":"2014-09-06T19:40:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/?p=3801"},"modified":"2014-09-07T16:10:32","modified_gmt":"2014-09-07T20:10:32","slug":"barack-obama-tight-poker-player","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/barack-obama-tight-poker-player","title":{"rendered":"Barack Obama: A Tight Poker Player"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/barack-obama-poker.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/barack-obama-poker.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"barack-obama-poker\" width=\"244\" height=\"171\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-3805\" \/><\/a>Enter the term &#8220;poker&#8221; in the Google News feed and you&#8217;re likely to turn up plenty of results involving politics. And in most cases, the term is badly misused. But the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.economist.com\/news\/united-states\/21615615-barack-obama-shows-his-hand-americas-enemies-playing-poker-world\">Economist<\/a> recently gave applying poker to politics a shot and didn&#8217;t do such a bad job. Here&#8217;s a look at what they wrote regarding Barack Obama:<\/p>\n<p><em>HE CALLS himself a \u201cpretty good\u201d poker player. Barack Obama\u2019s poker-buddies, including Illinois politicians who played with him weekly when he was a state senator, tend to agree. Quizzed by profile-writers, they have described a cautious, canny card player. <\/p>\n<p>Mr Obama would bluff only if he had halfway-decent cards, they recalled. When opponents bet high, Mr Obama would not engage unless he held a strong hand of his own. <\/p>\n<p>As president, he is said to favour a more demure card game, spades. That may be just as well. At a bumpy moment in history, Mr Obama is strikingly, even confoundingly, reluctant to bluff.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>All during his election campaign, the poker media world enjoyed focusing on Obama&#8217;s love of poker. And many hoped that Obama would become a champion for online poker, furthering federal legislation along the way. Well, this never happened because Obama has a lot on his plate. But it&#8217;s interesting to see that the media is still harping on Obama&#8217;s poker skills almost seven years later. <\/p>\n<p>This time, the Economist is trying to relate poker to Obama&#8217;s handling of the Ukraine situation. The President doesn&#8217;t want to use military action to intervene with the conflict between Ukraine and Russia\/Russian separatists. But if things continue escalating, could Obama eventually play his hand more aggressively in the future? We&#8217;ll see&#8230;but for the time being, it looks like he is content to sit back and be more passive.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Enter the term &#8220;poker&#8221; in the Google News feed and you&#8217;re likely to turn up plenty of results involving politics. And in most cases, the term is badly misused. But the Economist recently gave applying poker to politics a shot and didn&#8217;t do such a bad job. Here&#8217;s a look at what they wrote regarding [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,1],"tags":[1795,1798,1796,1886,1797,1799],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3801"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3801"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3801\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3809,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3801\/revisions\/3809"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3801"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3801"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepokerpractice.com\/poker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3801"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}